Відео

It might happen in the future when/if I decide to replay the game, not any time soon though I'm afraid.

Depending on the area, true. But it's good enough.

No, regular Hynix GDDR6.

If memory serves me right, that's where I heard it first also

It's called Nuke. You should have it offline also.

@@CorwinMaximus Okay yes. I have it. But it looks kind of different in your video. Maybe your game is an older version.

@@dreyb1801 Perhaps so, the video is 6 years old after all.

@@CorwinMaximus Yeah. True

The game has been updated a lot since and is now a lot more demanding unfortunately.

Та ты шо ? А ты где то еще было?дурдылы гаджо.

Сейчас таких цыган нет, как Ляля Чёрная, Соня Тимофеева...

There is actually a very subtle shadow, I just played it at 4K and 0.25 speed - could be intended as such by the devs, could be the somewhat low rendering resolution (58% of 1080p).

ASUS Mini Dual OC V2

My findings exactly, yes you can get the game playable on a 3060ti with overdrive but it either feels sluggish or all the textures get smudged out.

You can also use the "old" raytracing, you just need to disable Path tracing and the old options will appear.

@@CorwinMaximus Thanks for the answer.

@@AlexNeskajuhin You're welcome.

It seems the dev's thought of it already, changing this SSR with RT Overdrive on does not impact FPS one bit.

@@CorwinMaximus I see. That's unfortunate.

@@CorwinMaximus but the game still uses SSR for fogs reflections and those arrows on the road.

@@professorclup1082 I guess then that the impact on performance is negligible, as I really haven't noticed even 1 FPS more (which would be ~3%).

@@CorwinMaximus I think its a different version of SSR which ray tracing uses. Using ray tracing a bvh structure is generated, and pretty sure fog isnt a part of it and so it uses an ssr effect to counter that.

Gave it a spin with 2.5.1, don't see any difference in performance (it's all in the margin of error) what does greatly impact performance tho is setting DLSS to Performance mode, but there is a bit more shimmering with it - the gains are substantial tho - 20-30% of FPS gains (e.g. 30-39 FPS). Changing in-game settings save for texture quality can give 1-2 FPS max even if i set everything to it's lowest value.

@@CorwinMaximus yup changing to dlss 2.5.1 won't give u any performance boost except only visual upgrade. Dlss 2.5.1 has less shimmering and better upscaling than 2.3. also thank u for testing. Which do u prefer? Balance mode 2.3 or performance mode 2.5.1?

@@ForceInEvHorizon Well this 1.62 version runs DLSS 3.1.10, and seems quite similar visually to me when compared to 2.5.1, very hard to spot any difference

@@CorwinMaximus mhm thats weird. I saw some vids on youtube that someone change they're dlss version to 2.5.1 and compared it to 2.3 and there seems to be a huge difference in his video

@@ForceInEvHorizon That's interesting, when I downloaded the game today I got 3.1.10 DLSS version, no question about it, maybe they had the game installed for a while and that's why that was their DLSS version. Going through the benchmark with all of the settings Performance mode does seem to be usable with a respectable FPS boost, while Ultra Performance is just too smudged. It does beg the question though is it worth it when most of the time the differences are negligible.

Very demanding calculations and computations, next-gen technologies.

In my testing (at least on my card), max power gains are ~6-8% (meaning 2-3 FPS), at the cost of 20 degrees higher temperature and 70W more power usage - which is extremely inefficient in my opinion.

@@CorwinMaximus If that is the case, understandable

@@CorwinMaximus This is the first time my card has hit 70c+ while playing.

They are both a lot newer cards, both will run far cry 4

It should, Quadro 3000M is a better GPU.

You can try but the .dll file is missing so it probably won't have such a low resolution and the FPS will be worse.

Maybe

@@CorwinMaximus nvm it works perfectly fine

Nono, it's a different machine, the old one died unfortunately. Also thanks 😁

Yes?

Can be RAM or thermal throttling.

20

Yes?

@@CorwinMaximus I wanted to ask if the card in the video has 2GB of memory? PS I do not know English well, sorry

@@olegbogdanets7421 No problem man, yes, it is the laptop version with 2GB of VRAM.

I think you can. But you should try for yourself.

surely can, current intel graphics are way faster than hd 3000 and 4000

@@blackops320 thanks

"Fine" xD

@@CorwinMaximus :))) fine is good thanks for the content!

@@ilarionispas5104 Glad you enjoyed it! :)